I Got Herpes From A Dog

10th Fayolsche bridge

It would probably be incomplete, a quick post on the administrative approach to writing and not to mention the Fayolsche bridge (footbridge). Fayol describes in his approach, the importance and uniqueness of the stages of appeal, which must be strictly adhered to (the unity line). In practice, however, has shown that the results of several reasons to unnecessary complexity.

- information is lost on its way through the

- Time-critical information to reach the question is not "in time"

- technical discussions are not possible in this way

- ; Unnecessary inclusion of non-involved persons

- high administrative and communication costs for simple problems in itself

Compliance with the official channels can (kann!) in consequence of certain constellations of decision making and information transmission can be counterproductive. The proposal to solve this dilemma is simple.

Fayolsche bridge

result is not the footsteps to follow, but to follow the direct route (similar to arrows). The big challenge is the definition of cases and additional duties, in which the Fayolsche bridge may be entered.

These include, in my view, all kinds of technical discussions and exchange of information. Decisions, which should have a purely technical background and scope of my opinion, always between the relevant experts will be developed and adopted. If these decisions are contrary to later decisions, it must necessarily have an informational the stages of appeal (official channels) occur. Generally requires the use of the bridge Fayolschen a delegation of responsibility to the affected area - and vice versa, consistent information from the affected area to supervisors. Thus, the operational structures (hierarchy) and a practical interest and power of decision into account.